Your a party of European Americans. Accept it or die.
Posted on 11. Nov, 2008 by Shera Crossan in Editorials, Feedback, Shera Crossan, Top Stories
You are a party of European-Americans. Accept it or die.
November 10, 2008
In the wake of the Republican defeat, there is the inevitable soul searching and jockeying for control. The project of defining the Republicans is quite a bit harder than for the Democrats. The Democrats don’t have an identity problem, at least since they got rid of the Southern contingent and unions (apart from government unions) began to be fairly irrelevant. They’re the party of the minorities, government workers, sexual non-conformists, and diverse beneficiaries of the leftist entitlement culture. These people all get along with each other and have no problem supporting each others’ pet projects, notwithstanding the little falling-out between the cultural leftists and the minorities over the California ballot proposition banning same-sex marriage. At least they can agree on looking forward to a post-European future.
But who are the Republicans? These are people who really aren’t on the same page at all, so after each major defeat it’s a Herculean effort to try to keep it all together. You’ve got the big business–globalist–Wall Street Journal–open borders–free trade crowd (the ones with the money). These people actually get along quite well with the neocons whose main agenda is to make the world safe for Israel and are liberals in every other way, especially on immigration. Then there’s the libertarians — people far too principled to find any reason to oppose the mass immigration that has gutted the America they grew up in and not seeming to realize that the people coming here are definitely not on page with their vision of America.
And there is the Republican base — working class and middleclass whites with various ideologies, mainly Christianity. They are remnants of the Reagan coalition and they were critical to the electoral victories of George W. Bush. source
Clearly McCain ran an inept campaign.
You’re a party of European Americans. Accept it or die.
Accept it and die anyway.
this analysis is a bit off…
because the republican party is trying to make political decisions to remain relevant, it is not trying to mount a white man’s revolution.
In 100 years, should there be no revolution, the Republican party will still be there as a party for the overprivledged “please don’t tax me because I earn more than you in a day than you do in a year” party, as well as the “we think there should be a hard stance on crime” party. It was even be a “screw you, I have a right to my gun” party, but the point is it can exist in the future without us fine. We, on the other hand, cannot…that is, we cannot survive without a party that stands up for us the way the Republican Party pretended to for the last 20 or so years.
We need a party by, for and about whites. The GOP ain’t it!
If the GOP embraces Ron Paul and his platform, I think they will have a chance as soon as Obongo has his time in the sun. Maybe then, the dipshit white race traitors who voted for him will realize that they’ve been taken for a ride. Dr. Paul wouldn’t even have to mention the word “white”. Then again, I’m a dreamer. but at least I dream of liberty.
just a thought: there are people who think that the Northwest area may make a good place for a white homeland, or at least, a place of regrouping and resistance. Instead of the Northwest, how about the South? They gave McCain some of his biggest victories, and they also tried to secede from the union already.
Maybe some sort of feasibility study could be made.
The democratic and republican parties are both cemented in by malicious election laws designed to suppress minority parties.
It’s a way of making a false democracy out of a true democracy. “You can have your little election.”
Yeah, I know we”re supposed to be a republic, not a democracy. Yeah, yeah.
I think the republican party didn’t want to win this election.
a244, you make some good points.