Sharia OK with Obama’s Top Lawyer
Posted on 04. Jun, 2009 by Shera Crossan in Feedback, Foreign and Domestic Intelligence, Immigration, Politics, Race, Shera Crossan, Top Stories, Tradition
President Obama has tabbed the former dean of Yale Law School, Harold Koh, to become the legal adviser for the State Department. Among numerous questionable and controversial statements, Koh has said that the “war on terror” — a term which the Obama Administration has already quietly abandoned, was “obsessive.” And in a 2007 speech, according to a lawyer who was in the audience, Koh opined that “in an appropriate case, he didn’t see any reason why sharia law would not be applied to govern a case in the United States.”
Asked for comment, a spokeswoman for Koh waved the incident away: “I had heard that some guy…had asked a question about sharia law, and that Dean Koh had said something about that while there are obvious differences among the many different legal systems, they also share some common legal concepts.”
Probably Koh has something in mind akin to what the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, was thinking when he made his notorious statement that Islamic law was “unavoidable” in Britain. Williams didn’t mean that Britain would become a Sharia state, but only that Muslims could have recourse to private Sharia arbitration for marital disputes, inheritance matters, and the like. Stonings and amputations? Of course not. “Nobody in their right mind,” said Williams, “would want to see in this country the kind of inhumanity that’s sometimes been associated with the practice of the law in some Islamic states; the extreme punishments, the attitudes to women as well.” But, he concluded, the idea that “there’s one law for everybody…I think that’s a bit of a danger.” Equality of treatment and equality of rights for all people? A dangerous concept!
One may hope that Koh wouldn’t go that far, but in saying that “in an appropriate case” Sharia legal principles could be applied in the United States, he seems to be opening the door to Sharia courts in the U.S., instituted after the pattern already established in Britain.
Sharia courts are already operating there, and multiculturalists dismiss concerns about them by insisting that they’re just private, voluntary arbitration tribunals, like similar arbitration panels for Jews and Catholics. Complete Story
I found this video after reading this article; I watched enough of it to know this was an excellent example of how facts in history are thrown out the window in the interest of gaining support. The author of this video is a self admitted Christian, talking about a religion that existed (in its prime) mainly in Europe hundreds of years ago. It wasn’t until recent times did Odinism gain, a new following, and compared to other religions still has a very small amount of practitioners. The author of the video claims Odinists tried taking over the world, causing World War II.
Odinism was one of OUR ORIGINAL RELIGIONS, we were killed and tortured until our ancestors agreed to convert to Christianity and drop their PAGAN RELIGION. After conversion countless souls have been stolen from their Earthly vessels in the name of this religion. Millions upon millions were slain just for being Christian, as the Christian did to the Pagan. Now we find ourselves facing another Holy War that is going to benefit us just as well as the Christian religion has. Christians liked their religion so much they made several off shoots, all with different points of view, just like Islam, they can’t even get along amongst themselves let alone with some one else of a different religion.
Shouldn’t that be some sort of sign, all through out history “they” have changed their own views, slaughtered each other in mass because they seen something in a different light. How many different Christian sects are there? I have no idea about that, but I know why they have different sects. The two main reasons are power and not wanting to follow some damn law given by God (I say it this way because that is what the big three preach, God spoke to a certain few and it was these few that are to spread around the world) because it gets in the way of the first. It is the same with all popular religions. Once someone doesn’t feel they are getting what they think they should from their religion they break away and form their own versions of the same religion. Islam has the same problems Jews have the same problem with their religions. Yet they all think everyone should believe the way they do, when none can agree with the other.
I am tired of the hypocrisy in everything, politicians traveling America before the election telling everyone how wonderful they are, how patriotic and American, but if you give me just a little money, you and I will make this a better place. Then they get in office, say they are going to do as they told you but it will take some time, so in the mean while “they” decide it is best for us to shell out trillions of dollars so we don’t have any more job loss. When now that the smoke has dissipated and the mirrors have broken, and we can see semi clearly it was just a ruse to get the company in government hands. Money was sent from America to bailout “European” countries. Countries that did not want the money (citizen wise, I am certain no banker or “business man” turned them down) because it was going to raise taxes. Does anyone else see the similarities of these “financial problems” around the world and the propaganda from the Cold War era?
Jews run the banks, Jews are killing Muslims. Muslims “flee” to Christian nations that support the very “people” who caused them to leave their home country. The Christian nations are threatened with economic collapse if they don’t allow the Muslims in. Once in the Muslim wants total control.
I don’t understand what it will take for people to see these religions are not OURS, they are not designed for us, and they don’t benefit us. They go against everything WE WERE, WHAT SHOULD BE NOW.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x447p9_911-work-of-an-antichrist-part-3-od_news