Saturday, 4th September 2010

FOX Radio Alan Colmes’ Waterloo with John de Nugent

Posted on 18. Jun, 2009 by Shera Crossan in Audio-Video, Commentary, Events, Free Speech, Opinion, Shera Crossan, Top Stories

Dear journalists and white comrades,

Alan Colmes is a bright, articulate Jewish liberal I always enjoyed watching as he used logic to skewer the neo-con windbag and chicken-hawk Sean Hannity (who like most neo-cons never served in uniform) from 1996-Jan. 2009 on FOX News Channel’s 9 pm “Hannity and Colmes” show.

His website (http://www.alan.com/radio-bios/) says: “[Alan] has interviewed many key political and pop culture figures, including Former President Bill Clinton, Vice President Al Gore, Lynn Cheney, former Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, Senators  Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Barack Obama and John McCain, Newt Gingrich, Deepak Chopra, and Carole King.’

So I gladly accepted Alan Colmes’ invitation to appear on his new coast-to-coast FOX Radio show on Tuesday, 6/16/09 to discuss the shocking James von Brunn incident and more importantly, the context of white angst and white separatism.

Hear the show and read about it — the 15-minute scheduled segment became 54 fiery minutes — and hear the audofile (without commercial interruptions) here –

http://enationalist.com/john_de_nugent/blog/2009/06/nuge-pulls-pilpuller-alan-colmes-chain/ –  and judge for yourself if I dismantled Alan Colmes and took over his show to the point he thanked me ruefully for letting him be on my show….

White separatists worldwide are jubilating, and the left is complaining that I am a dangerous media monster ….and a combination of Christopher Walken and Neal McDonough….. if they had a baby and no one held it.

John de Nugent

Pittsburgh

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , ,

6 Responses to “FOX Radio Alan Colmes’ Waterloo with John de Nugent”

  1. Belatucadros 18 June 2009 at 8:54 pm #

    de Nugent has lost all credibility, in my eyes. He is a zionist, has been a member of at least one jewish organization. And those are his words not mine.

  2. a244 18 June 2009 at 9:28 pm #

    Yeah, alotta talk. I sat through it.

    Mental sparring, that’s all it was.

  3. CalzaghetheCracker 19 June 2009 at 9:56 pm #

    Mr. de Nugent did a fine job under the circumstances.

    He managed to spread some truth and stay out of the traps that Colmes kept trying to set.

    I particularly liked the reference to muds coming to every majority-white country by whatever means possible including the landing gear of planes.

    He earned another point for saying “Why shouldn’t I want a white homeland just like the jews want a jewish homeland”.

    The argument that Obama was guilty for von braun’s action was a loser from the start. That was a mistake, but hey, we all would’ve screwed up more than once. No one’s perfect.

    As a white seperatist, I would’ve liked to have heard Mr. de Nugent say that seperatism is something that most people want in their hearts – yet they fear saying it out loud.

    All in all, nice job Mr. de Nugent.

  4. a244 19 June 2009 at 10:59 pm #

    Just two glib fast-talking fast-reacting people sparring with each other.

  5. Belatucadros 20 June 2009 at 2:07 pm #

    No one with conviction in their beliefs will be afraid to voice it, or at least shouldn’t be. He wasn’t afraid to admit he is a Zionist; and is that not what we are trying to separate from, Zionist control?
    It started off like it would be heated, until he said he was Zionist, then it was time for phone calls, and did the listeners mention the Zionist part in their rants? NO. Did the heated debate continue after that? No.
    After admitting he was Zionist, it went just as a244 says, a battle of witz, by two zionists.

    I do have to admit the one caller, had the most fantastic tale. I think I listened to that part four times, it was so funny.

    All we need now is a real “White” leader that can articulate as well as Mr. de Nugent. One who will not cower before the Zionists. We do not need another Zionist waving a White banner, we have (have had) enough of those.

  6. CalzaghetheCracker 20 June 2009 at 6:41 pm #

    What I heard him say is that he’s a zionist for a white homeland.

    As a white seperatist, I’m not opposed to a seperate jewish homeland, a palestinain homeland, a white homeland, a black homeland, etc. Ideally, whites should be on seperate continents from blacks, but thal would take several lifetimes to achieve and perhaps a return to segregation is the best we work towards in our lifetimes.


Leave a Reply

Please fill the required box or you can’t comment at all. Please use kind words. Your e-mail address will not be published.

Gravatar is supported.

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>